<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>The Sage Dictionary of Statistics</title>
<link href="http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/750" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/750</id>
<updated>2026-04-04T13:14:42Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-04-04T13:14:42Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>The Sage Dictionary of Statistics</title>
<link href="http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/751" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Cramer, Duncan</name>
</author>
<id>http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/751</id>
<updated>2013-03-22T06:56:08Z</updated>
<published>2004-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">The Sage Dictionary of Statistics
Cramer, Duncan
Writing a dictionary of statistics is one thing – writing a practical dictionary of statistics&#13;
is another. The entries had to be useful, not merely accurate. Accuracy is not that&#13;
useful on its own. One aspect of the practicality of this dictionary is in facilitating the&#13;
learning of statistical techniques and concepts. The dictionary is not intended to stand&#13;
alone as a textbook – there are plenty of those. We hope that it will be more important&#13;
than that. Perhaps only the computer is more useful. Learning statistics is a complex&#13;
business. Inevitably, students at some stage need to supplement their textbook. A trip&#13;
to the library or the statistics lecturer’s office is daunting. Getting a statistics dictionary&#13;
from the shelf is the lesser evil. And just look at the statistics textbook next to it –&#13;
you probably outgrew its usefulness when you finished the first year at university.&#13;
Few readers, not even ourselves, will ever use all of the entries in this dictionary.
</summary>
<dc:date>2004-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
